360Tuna

Go Back   360Tuna > SALTWATER FISHING OFFSHORE > Jigging and Popping
Home Forum Auction Reviews Gallery Games Register FAQ Members List Trip Calendar
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-28-2008, 05:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Formula4Fish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ingleside-on-the-Bay, TX
Posts: 64
Formula4Fish is on a distinguished road
Matching Rods, Reels, and Jigs

With megaseas offshore I'm reduced to fiddling with tackle.

My intention here is to match reels with rods, and pair them up so that both rod and reel reach their limits at about the same time.

I have two Shimano Trevala rods that I tested with a spring
scale, to determine the max drag each rod could sustain before it
"bottomed out". That is, I increased the drag until I was able to make the line
touch the rod, then measured how much drag it took.

It turned out the TVC-66H maxed out at 12#, while the TVC-58XH maxed out
at 18#. This is what I would expect... the XH is stronger than the H.

What confuses me is the way Shimano rates them in recommended jig
weight. They say the TVC-66H, the lightest rod, is best with 270-325
gram jigs. They say the heavier TVC-58XH is best with 160-270 gram
jigs.

Why would Shimano recommend heavier jigs for a rod that can only handle
12# of drag, and lighter jigs for a rod that can handle 18# of drag?

It seems logic would suggest that rods that can deal with more drag
should also perform best with heavier jigs. If fact, it seems heavier jigs would be required to get the right action from a stiffer rod.

Ideas?
Formula4Fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 09:35 AM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
rhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 95
rhale is on a distinguished road
I am not sure but I believe that the shorter heavier Trevalla rods are intended for the longer knife jigs made by shimano and they dont make them as heavy as the short stubby butterfly jigs which are intended to be used with the longer rods. This is the only reason that I can come up with, and its just a guess.
I got away from using Trevalla rods all together due to the light amount drag they can handle.
rhale is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 04:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Formula4Fish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ingleside-on-the-Bay, TX
Posts: 64
Formula4Fish is on a distinguished road
Thanks Ronnie...

I'm with you about only being able to guess why Shimano rates them that way. I'm also with you about passing by the Trevalas if I expect to be using anything more than moderate drag. They make better Snapper rods than Yellowfin rods
Formula4Fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 07:00 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Bret's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,057
Bret is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick_Formula233
Thanks Ronnie...

I'm with you about only being able to guess why Shimano rates them that way. I'm also with you about passing by the Trevalas if I expect to be using anything more than moderate drag. They make better Snapper rods than Yellowfin rods

you are right about the that. Thats about all I would use my trevala xh for anymore.. snapper and small stuff...
Bret is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.


Copyright © 2006 360Tuna.com - The user submitted content are property of their posters.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Hosting By Ewdison Then - Forum Powered by vBulletin ©2006 Jelsoft Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0