![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Reviews | Gallery | Games | Register | FAQ | Members List | Trip Calendar |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 1,471
![]() |
which boats do? The Port A boats? I do not think the Big E has rental gear for tuna, but really had no need to ask about it so i dont know.
again....if a boat can do 24 knots, 130 miles is a 5 hour run. Right now all the boats in port A are doing overnighters. But bc of the speed it takes them 30-36 hours. Nothing to do abt it there, just unfortunate that they can't do 20-25 knots. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 482
![]() |
I was saying 2 weeks you should still get a refund. In reality you should be able to get all your money back if they can fill your spot. I doubt they do that though.
I have only been on one boat and used the showers. I would definately do it more often as it keeps me from dragging a$$ when I get back on shore... Maybe a stop and swim policy just to rinse...yeah right... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 1,471
![]() |
Quote:
haha yeah really On a positive note - the boats I've been on here have chunked quite well so kudos there. It helps when you can catch a billion blackfin to chunk with! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: little elm, tx., USA
Posts: 560
![]() |
The big E is good for that because of the speed. I could not imagine the mayhem that would ensue as a result of 40+ anglers that just paid $700+
to get their fish in just 9 hrs. but it could happen if there was a dedicated communication network, of sorts, between the platforms, crewboats, commercial and sport fleets, and such. Time is the costliest factor on a trip like that. on the other hand, The big E is PERFECT for true long-range, 3-14 day type trips like the SD fleet. Shorten the annual trip list to about 6-8 trips per year, and focus on that w/ the big boats, all while keeping the "smaller" 65-80' boats focused on the 120mile, 36-52 hr. trips. Obviously, there would need to be a lot of sucesses, thus bringing more boats on the scene, and this is NEVER gonna happen unless the general economy, and more to the point, NMFS "issues" are vastly improved. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 1,471
![]() |
yeah....well, the 30-hour trips should cost much less than $700 i would hope...but maybe i'm wrong
![]() I think if somehow they can find the monster yellows then doing 5+ day trips would be a good thing. If you're just gonna catch 60-110lbs tuna on average then normal trips are fine, but if they target the tuna you see off of venice from time to time then that'd be awesome! |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: little elm, tx., USA
Posts: 560
![]() |
It's a good way to pass the time and pump everyone up while setting up for the evening. Had fun w/ it on the Gulf Eagle for about an hour waiting for dark.
Otherwise, I'd rather be casting or jigging. -B |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 1,471
![]() |
man we did it all day on the viking for 3 days or so. the bigeye had already left so we had very little action. i think they saw one marlin come up but got nothing other than a few tuna. trolling for 13 hours meant a lot of sleep for me
![]() 20 rods out with 2 rotations meant a monster cluster-F as well. cool thing is they might be able to stick some wahoo on the troll which is always exciting. |
|
|
|